Writing to My MPs Again…..(On Mr Fulwood’s Advice)

Subject: Re: UNRESOLVED ISSUES ARISING FROM BLOCK VISIT ON 4th September 2007
To: lee_kuan_yew@pmo.gov.sg, kootk@mindef.gov.sg, indranee.rajah@drewnapier.com, lui_tuck_yew@moe.gov.sg, samtan@cdac.org.sg
Cc: “Yam Keng Baey” <baey.yamkeng@capitaland.com>, tnp@sph.com.sg, npeditor@sph.com.sg, santokh@sph.com.sg, tekmeng@sph.com.sg, melvin@sph.com.sg, kenjr@sph.com.sg, muralis@sph.com.sg
Date: Tuesday, 28 April, 2009, 8:16 PM

Dear Sir / Madam;

The New Paper Article “Go to your MP instead of Complaining” on 28th April 09, which remind us to stop complaining and go to our MP instead.

Perhaps I should refresh my MP and in fact, the whole Tanjong Pagar GRC MPs that despite sending numerous emails and reminders, till to date, I have not receive any response from my MPs.

Perhaps Mr Fulwood or Ms Elysa Chan are not aware that we can write what we want to our MPs, but MPs have the luxury to chose not to respond to us, and in situation like this, what is next for us?
cheers;

Jaslyn Go

— On Thu, 10/4/08, Jaslyn Go wrote:

Subject: UNRESOLVED ISSUES ARISING FROM BLOCK VISIT ON 4th September 2007
To: lee_kuan_yew@pmo.gov.sg, kootk@mindef.gov.sg, indranee.rajah@drewnapier.com, lui_tuck_yew@moe.gov.sg, samtan@cdac.org.sg
Cc: “Yam Keng Baey” <baey.yamkeng@capitaland.com>, chengwee@sph.com.sg
Date: Thursday, 10 April, 2008, 3:47 PM

Dear Sir / Madam (Tanjong Pagar GRC),
I am writing in as a constituent in your ward as my MP Mr Baey YK has failed to reply me even after 7 reminders were sent.
At the block visit which the questions were raised, MP Baey assured me that he will look into them and get back to me, however, till to date, 7 months after his block visit, I have yet to hear from him.
I need urgent attention towards point 8 (a)and  (b) as the recent rainy weather has made the situation worse. There has been no action from any department to improve the situation.
In a ST article on 13 Jan 2008 by Teo Cheng Wee, MP Baey commented that for spams and wacky emails, it will be straight to his computer trash bin..
In the same article, Hong Kah GRC MP Zaqy Mohamad said he will spends about an hour or two clearing some 100 e-mail regarding his constituency every day. Of these, one or two might be mass e-mail, He prioritises his responses. He is more concerned about those from his residents.
Now, I am concerned as to whether my emails on the unresolved issues arising from MP’s block visit is considered by MP Baey as a spam / wacky email.
Shouldn’t all MPs be concerned with the issues the resident raised as pointed out by Hong Kah GRC MP?
Awaiting a reply soon.
Thank you.
Jaslyn Go
Jaslyn Go wrote:

Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:33:33 +0800 (CST)
From: Jaslyn Go
Subject: UNRESOLVED ISSUES ARISING FROM BLOCK VISIT ON 4th September 2007 – Final Reminder
To: BAEY.YamKeng@capitaland.com, yamkeng@pacific.net.sg

Hi Mr Baey..

Email send on 09 October 2007 – No reply.

1st reminder – 25 October 2007 – No reply
2nd reminder – 08 November 2007 – No reply
3rd reminder – 23 November 2007 – email bounce back
4th reminder – 27 November 2007 – No reply
5th reminder -  7 December 2007 – No reply
6th reminder – 27 December 2007 – No reply
7th reminder – 19 February 2008 – reply
Let this be my final reminder Mr Baey..

Good Day!

Jaslyn Go

Ms Jaslyn Go
25th September 2007

Mr. Baey Yam Keng
Member of Parliament for

Tanjong Pagar GRC, Bukit Merah Division

Dear Sir,

UNRESOLVED ISSUES ARISING FROM BLOCK VISIT ON 4th September 2007

When you came to my unit during a block visit on 04/09/2007, I raised several issues to you and we had the following exchange, set out below for your easy recollection and reference:-
1. My neighbour and I commented on the slow timing of the Singapore Police Force in response to our complaints listed in short as follows:-
    1. There are Indian glue sniffers who often loiter at the staircase and hide there to sniff glue.
    2. Inhalant abuse, a criminal act, is known to intoxicate the abusers who are then predisposed to committing more crimes.
    3. This situation has occurred many times and whenever I call the police, the latter would take 30 to 45 minutes to arrive, by which the time, the suspects would have finished their glue sniffing and left the scene.
    4. I shifted out 2 years back partly because of this situation as I was pregnant and I did not feel that the neighbourhood was safe at times.
    5. I also raised another incident in which I spotted an axe-wielding Indian man sitting in the ABC hawker centre with his eyes fixated on the adjoining car park as if he was waiting to greet someone. I called the police and offered to help identify the axe-wielder.
    6. The axe-wielder must have been loitering around on a frequent basis for the Indian man in your entourage was also able to describe him as limpy and short.
    7. I told you that the police had reasoned that they had to catch him red handed for them to take action. However, in order to apprehend any suspect red-handed, the police must respond in time but they never did so.
2. You trusted the police not to deliberately take their own sweet time to respond and cited the lack of manpower in the Police force as the cause. An Indian male in your entourage who identified himself as a policeman seconded your view.
3. I responded that the lack of manpower was not a valid reason as it is the right of every citizen and resident to be protected by the Singapore Police Force.
4. The grassroots policeman had replied that the Police had other complaints to handle and that our wards have kept them busy. I grew up in Bukit Merah and I know the ward very well and I asked him:-
    1. Whether he was asserting that Bukit Merah was very much unsafe and with a lot of criminal activity necessitating police attention and which leads to slow response time of the Police, and
    2. Since there was indeed so much crime in Bukit Merah, why did not the Police deploy more manpower to cope with the cases?
5. You surprised me by asking me in return, “So Madam, what you think we should do? If no one wants to join the police force we can’t force people to join right?¡±
6. To this unimaginative excuse, I told you very frankly that: -
    1. As an MP, you have been given the mandate by the people to find solutions to our complaints; and
    2. If you need me to provide you with the answers, what then are you supposed to do in your position as our Member of Parliament?
7. You quickly retracted your words and instructed your grassroots policeman to look into this matter. You also responded that since my opinion was formed 2 years ago, it might not be justified now as it may not be happening now. [I have since verified with my neighbour that the glue sniffers are still loitering around at times and now of course I am asking for a reply]
Town Council issues
8. Next, my neighbour and I brought up the following issue concerning the management of common areas in our block under the purview of your town council:-
    1. I reside in a point block where the lift lobby area’s natural lighting is dim. This is made worse by having doors installed at the staircases such that even during daytime it is dim and made worse when it is cloudy, rainy or overcast
    2. On several occasions, my neighbours, our maids, our children and myself have slipped and fallen because the bad lighting prevented us from seeing that the floor was wet from the rain.
9. As MP and Town Councillor,:-
    1. you asked your accompanying town council staff whether the lights could be switched on when it is cloudy or rainy. The town council staff replied that residents could just call and request the town council to switch the lights on. He added that he needed to check if this was feasible and would revert
    2. You asserted that the doors were a design flaw which you could do nothing about. The staircase and door provides the residents privacy and therefore as residents we should give and take.
10. I replied that staircase doors cause more danger to residents as they provide cover for the glue sniffers. Furthermore residents could be ambushed by robbers hiding behind the staircase doors.
11. You then responded as follows:
    1. to switch the lights on 24 hours a day and 7 days a week would increase the electricity bill and this cost will have to be passed onto the residents. You asked whether or not we would want that.
    2. you cannot accede to every resident¡¯s request and that I would be very surprised at what some of the residents are asking for.
12. I replied that if I am requesting for TC to paint the wall in specific colours, then it is obviously unreasonable, but there is nothing unreasonable about requesting for proper lighting.
13. The Indian follower in your group claimed that in your block visit from the 25th floor to the 7th floor, no one complained about lighting problem except me and then blamed the poor lighting on my neighbour¡¯s bamboo blind.
14. My neighbour explained that the blind prevents children from climbing and rain from coming in but your entourage insisted that blind causes bad lighting.
15. If a mere blind can block natural light and cause lighting problems, what about the staircase doors then?
16. I then asked whether it was your position that since there was indeed nothing you could do about it, the residents would have no choice but to live with the inconvenience stemming from the fault of the person who designed the flats.
17. You then replied that you needed to check with the town council before you could reply to me. You asked to take leave as you had a few more floors to cover, but I managed to raise the following final issue.
The Compulsory Annuity
18. I asked for your position on the proposed Compulsory Annuity. To my surprise, you turned the question around to ask for my opinion. I replied that I was definitely against it for the following reasons:-
    1. CPF money is our money. As owners, we have the right to decide whether or not we need any annuity. It is not for the Government to decide for us
    2. In any event, what proportion of people live beyond 85 years of age? How big is that sector of the population in actual fact
    3. I reminded you that not everyone is as long lived as our great leader Mr. LKY. Furthermore in our generation, with the degree of stress and pollution environment, not many can even make it to their 60s.
    4. For the small percentage fortunate to lives beyond 60, the Government should do its duty to look after them and not pass the responsibility to others
    5. Our generation, being more educated, will know the importance of planning for our future retirement, and we do not need the Government to tell us what to do and what to buy for retirement.
19. You replied with the extremely common tagline these days: “To wait for 17 Sept, when all the details are out before adopting such a negative view about this annuity scheme”.
20. I replied that knowing the style of the PAP government:
    1. By the time the details are released on the 17 Sept parliamentary hearing, there will simply be another rubber-stamping exercise, and the fate of all those aged 50 or below will be sealed
    2. One need not look very far into history for examples of such arrogance: the GST increase, Presidential, Parliamentarian and Ministerial salary increments: Once the details are out, the decision is passed and our fate is sealed!
21. You then responded as follows:
    1. You referred to statistics which purportedly show that almost 50% of the current population will benefit from the annuity scheme
    2. You threw the challenge for me to walk around Block 3 to witness the large number of single old folk or those abandoned by their children and who have no one to look after them
    3. You cited the need for the government to increase the pool of resources to help those who have no means of supporting themselves in old
      age.
22. You tried to lower my manifest resistance by commenting that you believe that I would not need to rely on the annuity because I would have planned for my own retirement.
23. I pointed out to you the following:-
    1. The current older generation who could live to an old age would not benefit from the proposed annuity scheme as it applies only to those aged 50 or below
    2. Furthermore, like my case where I have my own retirement plan, why is the government still making it compulsory for these people who are better-off to buy the annuity
    3. Should it not be every citizen’s personal right to decide how we spend our CPF money? CPF Money is after all our money AND NOT the Government’s money.
24. You then tried to justify the compulsory annuity scheme’s workability on the following reason that the cost would only be a few thousand dollars.
25. I replied that being an MP who makes $13.5k per month and maybe possibly much more, a few thousands is not a lot to you, but if you being the MP were to take a walk around Block 3 as you have suggested, you would realize that a few thousand dollars would be enough to feed several families for a single month.
26. You declined to continue the discussion on the reason that you had to take leave to cover the remaining floors. Before you left you advised my neighbour and I to read a well written article by a financial adviser who is not related to the Government who had given a good insight on this annuity issue in the previous Friday’s Today newspaper.
27. I replied you that the article was all crap and that a number of my friends and I were going to write a letter to refute that article and that I would forward a copy of that letter to you. The letter drafted jointly with my friends on the compulsory annuity will be forwarded to you in due course.
28. In the meantime, this letter serves to remind you that the outstanding issues raised at the above block visit are still outstanding which I am now seeking your replies / action on the same.
29. My name, address and contact number was recorded by one member of your 10-man strong entourage, therefore I do believe that you would have not difficulty remembering me and the above conversation.
I look forward to receiving your reply.
Yours sincerely
Ms. Jaslyn Go

12 Responses

  1. The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Daily SG: 30 Apr 2009 Says:

    [...] Local Entreprenuers – TOC: Singaporeans need to overcome negative traits – Jaslyn Go’s Blog: Writing to My MPs Again…..(On Mr Fulwood’s Advice) – The Wayang Party: Drowning in the Nonsense age of AWARE, Swine flu etc – How do we cope with [...]

  2. tewniaseng Says:

    As far as I know this MP came in from back door, I don’t think he is a good MP!!Waste tax payer’s money !! Singapore is a small country,why need so many MPs if they can’t perform or busy with their full time jobs !!

  3. A Fool’s Paradise « Today In Singapore Says:

    [...] Singapore teenagers who have the temerity to complain, Fulwood actually advised, “They should approach their Member of Parliament, and try to solve the problem.” Was he in a coma when rag-and-bone man Ng Kim Ngweng was [...]

  4. Wilson Says:

    Hi. What is the update? Did they reply you? It is sad to see things turn out this way. At least he visit you, my MP don’t even come. I last saw him in person was when I’m 15, I already 23 now. Not even his volunteer came knocking on my doors this few years.

  5. jaslyngo Says:

    Hi Wilsom..

    Again they chose to ignore my emails..
    Not just the Tanjong Pagar GRC MPs, but TNP too, who are only keen to report the nice things from the PRs but not alternative views of citizens..

    What is the point of coming to block visit when the intention is just to show face and not help / listen to the residents?

  6. Baey Yam Keng Says:

    I chose not to communicate with u via email. Stop Harassing me and my councillors before we take legal action against you.

  7. jaslyngo Says:

    hi BYK..

    be careful, the real BYK might take legal action against you for impersonating him and using his email…

  8. Baey Yam Keng Says:

    rather then defaming BYK….

  9. Gerry low Says:

    Hi Jaslyn.. I just came across yr post.. I commend you and your effort in being so comprehensive in all the points. I can actually feel for all your frustration and the sense of having your hands tied by the standard answers, the uninterested responses, the lack of touch with the conditions in the ward(uninterested concern), and the pass-the-buck on mindset.

    I applaude your patience in waiting for a response, however futile it may be.

    I will be very keen for a reply by the govt on all your points.

    Pls post again..

    I wish folks like yourself were in positions that could make a change..

    Gerry Low

  10. Baey Yam Keng fans Says:

    Baey Yam Keng on Jaslyn :i met her during my block visit and discovered that it is meaningless to reason with her.

  11. nxxii Says:

    yes, I remembered at the last election, Mr Baey came for his house visit, I forwarded him an issue that I had spoken to Mr Chay Wai Chuen before and he told one of his entourage to write it down. I asked him for a time frame for his reply and he mentioned very soon. I highlighted to him that hopefully it will not be the the next election that we speak on the same matter. Well looks like the election is round the corner.

  12. humph Says:

    Hi Ms Go,

    I’m actually midly disturbed and highly curious as to why you took pains to highlight the Indian ethnicity of the various personalities you mentioned. I quote you below:

    “There are Indian glue sniffers who often loiter at the staircase and hide there to sniff glue…

    …I also raised another incident in which I spotted an axe-wielding Indian man…

    …The axe-wielder must have been loitering around on a frequent basis for the Indian man in your entourage was also able to describe him as limpy and short…

    …The Indian follower in your group claimed that in your block visit from the 25th floor to the 7th floor, no one complained about lighting problem except me and then blamed the poor lighting on my neighbour¡¯s bamboo blind…

    …An Indian male in your entourage who identified himself as a policeman seconded your view…”

    Why, Ms Go?

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.