Aug 22

World’s Most Powerful Women
Thursday, 20 August, 2009 4:43 PM

To:
readers@forbes.com

Dear Forbes,

I refer to your article on World’s Most Powerful Women.

I am especially disturbed by Forbes’s ranking of Mdm Ho Ching CEO of Temasek Holdings, Singapore at no. 5.

I understand that the criteria is based not on popularity but on the management of countries or big companies. I also understand that the rankings are based on press visibility and size of country/company.

It is true that Temasek Holdings is a large company that has a portfolio of approximately US$135 billion. However the losses that Mdm Ho incurred in from March to November 2008 was almost US$40 billion http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124350003544761935.html

And that is just what the public is told. The actual figure may even be more as it is a known fact that Temasek Holdings is a non-transparent entity. There is absolutely no accountability to the public. http://multimedia.asiaone.com/Multimedia/Vodcast/News/Story/A1Multimedia20090730-7422.html

Even the reason for the sudden change in leadership (the exit of Charles Goodyear) cannot and will not be explained to the public.

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com.my/index.php/business/35486-temaseks-goodyear-left-without-a-golden-handshake

Let’s also not forget the controversial purchase of Shin Corp run by former PM Thaksin. That transaction was by no means a small contributor to the unrest in Thailand and the eventual ousting of Mr. Thaksin.

As to press visibility, the world must understand that Singapore is not a democratic society. My country is run by an authoritarian regime under Lee Kuan Yew who although is 86, is still the man in control of the city-state. I’m sure Forbes knows that Mdm Ho is the wife of his prime minister-son, Hsien Loong

The media, judiciary, law enforcement and all public institutions are controlled by the ruling-party, if not by Lee senior himself.

Singapore’s media is ranked 144 out of 173 countries by Reporters Without Borders in 2008.http://www.rsf.org/en-classement794-2008.html The Chairman of the Singapore Press Holdings is none other than the ruling party stalwart, Tony Tan who is also our Deputy Prime Minister. All press coverage — print, telecast and broadcast — is controlled by the State, and by extension Mdm Ho Ching’s husband and father-in-law. How can then press coverage in this case be a fair assessment?

Non-local media such as Asian Wall Street Journal and Far Eastern Economic Review were fined for contempt of court and sued for defamation respectively

http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSSIN20311620080822

I am confident that Forbes had done thorough research on each of these women on the Most Powerful list. However, I am dismayed that Forbes could rank someone with the background and track record like Mdm Ho Ching 5th on the list.

Sincerely,
Jaslyn Go
Singapore

Aug 7

Our Burmese friend, John Moe wrote to our Foreign Minister – Mr George Yeo asking him to make clarifications on his recent comment  “John Moe was not expelled from Singapore because of his views but for breaking the law in Singapore.”

As John includes me in his response to Mr Yeo, I was privilage to be able to read all the exchanges between them and some of the activists.  What caught my attention and spur me to post a reply was when Mr Yeo ended all his response with a “Happy National Day”.

In this National Day, tell me, is there anything we should be happy about when billions of our hard earned money are lost, Singaporean are finding hard to make ends meets as not only the cost of living is rising up, we are competing with foreigners for job while our ministers are still getting their millions salaries, Singaporeans are losing their rights to speak up and yet our government are spending so much money in this tough time glorifying themselves.

Below are some of the exchanges between us…

August 6 at 6:00pm
Thank you for including me in this exchange…

I would expect that as a Minster and one who has a voice in parliament, Mr Yeo can do more than just find a country who can accept John Moe. He should find a solution to the root of the problem, which in this case, is the authoritarian law.

Mr Yeo claimed he do mix around with the Myanmar community..well..I do not know many of them, but I do know my Burmese friend prefers to call their homeland Burma instead of Myanmar….

As a Singaporean I should be proud and happy of my nation Independence Day, but how can I be when I feel that I do not belong to and have no voice in my own country. I was charged and currently standing trial for speaking up for my fellow Singaporeans about the rising cost of living here in a peaceful assembly last year.

While Mr Yeo is still drawing millions of salary a year, many Singaporeans are struggling to make ends meet. Mr Yeo, as our Minister, are you aware of the plight of your fellow Singaporeans?


August 6 at 10:44pm
This policy of not allowing Singapore to be used as a base against foreign governments has served us well although some may disagree. Tinkering with it has wider ramifications which I rather not discuss here.

John, thanks for surfacing the past correspondence and refreshing my memory. I remember Joshua appealing on your behalf which I was happy to take up.

Choon Hiong, the Home Ministry/AG has a certain discretion in deciding how to respond to breaches of the law. For WP holders, one way is to withdraw the permit or let it lapse. Sometimes a warning may be sufficient. Sometimes it is necessary to charge offenders in court. Our laws on public assembly and demos are well-known. Jaslyn is clearly opposed to them. I am sure there are others who share her views.

Happy National Day!


Today at 11:22am
Mr. Yeo,

I can’t help but feel that you are evading my question in your response. I had asked if you are aware of the plight of your fellow Singaporeans whilst you draw millions of dollars in salary, in fact, several times more than Mr. Obama. You did not respond. And instead unfeelingly end your posting with Happy National Day.

I’m sure there are many others who agree that in a genuinely democratic society, peaceful public gatherings and freedom of speech are basic rights granted to the people. Oh, I forget, this is Singapore we are talking about where democracy has a very different meaning from that which the universally accepted.

It is also interesting to note that you say the “Home Ministry/AG has a certain discretion in deciding how to respond to breaches of the law.” Is it the same kind of discretion you talk about when about 20 of us were charged for the gathering on World Consumers Day and the thousands of people from CASE who gathered the very next day were allowed to gather, process, march and speak.

Mr. Yeo, I believe this is not called discretion. The correct term here is “oppression”.


Today at 12:03pm

Jaslyn, this spate of exchanges is about Myanmar. I’m not really keen to open a new debate in my FB account about salaries, public assembly etc. Sorry if you thought I was not addressing your concerns. But I wanted to stay focussed on the Myanmar issue.

Kai Xiong raised LTTE which is another subject I don’t really want to go into now. When Prabakharan was killed, I did a blog posting about it.

Andrew, there is always prosecutorial discretion depending on circumstances. This is everyday life. As MPs, we are contantly appealing on behalf of constituents although never to the AG. This doesn’t mean that the law is not applied equally.

Well..at least finally, he got my message and did not end his reply with “Happy National Day”.
I remember reading somewhere our Ministers commented that the people are their employer, however, it is interesting to note that for once, it is not the employer who determine employees salaries but its a case of employees dictating their own salaries.
I make my point and I leave it at that…
Aug 7
http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/news/singapore/2637-join-us-to-bring-about-a-future-of-hope Print E-mail
News Singapore
Thursday, 06 August 2009
<!– @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } –> Singapore Democrats

Women Democrats deliver the SDP’s 2009 National Day message: It’s time that Singaporeans come together to reach out with the Singapore Democratic Party to bring about political change.


YouTube link here